Cervical cancer screening research
Our results should be interpreted with caution because the database had important limitations. It seems likely that unpublished studies were performed with fewer resources and under lower standards of quality assurance. Therefore, even if the negative results may have remained unpublished, there is also a possibility that the results presented in our review underestimate the true negative results of cryotherapy and leep performed under routine conditions in the peripheral settings deprived of resources. Our review does not provide evidence that cryotherapy and leep for cervical lesions in low- and middle-income are associated with side effects, more frequent or more severe than in resource-rich settings. Our review indicates, however, that the current data are insufficient to fully inform decisions on protocols for the Pap test in women and women of childbearing age with HIV.
Finally, alternatives to cryotherapy and leep are needed. Sibylle kristensen, jeffrey its silt and Mulindi h mwanahamuntu also contributed to this work. We thank catherine hogan smith for his expert help in the electronic search and casey w. Frew for his contribution to the effort to recover the publishing and data abstraction. The project described was supported by several r21ca124336 price of the National Cancer Institute.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. Features cryotherapy studies, and cryotherapy studies against leep, included in the review. Characteristics of LEEP only studies included in the review. The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Teaching Hospital. Cervical cancer as a priority to prevention in different regions of the world. Prevention of cervical cancer in the developing world. Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings.
Mandelblatt js, lawrence wf, the Gaffikin, limpahayom kk, Lumbiganon p, s warakamin, et al. The costs and benefits of different screening strategies for cervical cancer in less developed countries. Goldie SJ, the Gaffikin, Goldhaber-Fiebert jd, gordillo tobar-a, c Levin, Mahe c, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in five developing countries. Screening for early detection of the disease, the need for evidence.
Rethink Breast Cancer Screening and prostate cancer. Barratt, Irwig L, p Glasziou, Cumming RG, raffle, hicks n, et al. How to use the guidelines and recommendations on screening. Technology, treatment, politics – what is appropriate. Projection – the Trojan horse of preventive medicine. Arbyn m, Sankaranarayanan r, r Muwonge, keita n dolo has Mbalawa CG, et al.
The combined analysis of the accuracy of the five cancer screening tests for cervical evaluated in the eleven studies in Africa and India. Koliopoulos g, m Arbyn, martin hirsch-p, m kyrgiou, Prendiville w, e Paraskevaidis. A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Application of cryosurgery gynecological cancer.
Experience using cryotherapy for the treatment of precancerous cervical lesions in low-resource settings. Pfaendler ks, mwanahamuntu mh, Sahasrabuddhe vv v Mudenda, stringer ZCS, gp parham. A new management approach for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Castro w gauge j, l Gaffikin, Ferreccio c Sellors j, j Sherris, et al. Efficacy, safety and acceptability of cryotherapy. A new proposal for evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and the results of an investigation.
Bhatla n, Gulati, mathur sr, s rani, anand k, r Muwonge, et al. Evaluation of cervical screening in rural north India. Luciani s gonzales m, s munoz, Jeronimo j, s Robles. Cryotherapy treatment efficacy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Coffey ps, Bingham has jl Winkler, bishop, Sellors jw, lagos g, et al.